<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Experimental Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://constantflux.org/2008/09/02/experimental-media/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://constantflux.org/2008/09/02/experimental-media/</link>
	<description>Hacking the Future</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 02:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nas Hoosen</title>
		<link>http://constantflux.org/2008/09/02/experimental-media/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Nas Hoosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constantflux.org/?p=276#comment-551</guid>
		<description>You know, I've been saying pretty much the same thing about local media products for a while now. Why aren't we, with our current 'deficiency', seeking to encourage more cross-pollination between multiple media platforms? Of course, we often see why (especially in journalism lectures at university, let me tell you); the old biases are still standing up like barbed wire fencing around each alternate media hub. The newspaper 'journos' still see themselves as better than the TV/radio guys, who like to think of themselves as stars (and, honestly, who in South Africa can convince you that they're an honest-to-gosh "star"?).
Maybe I'm oversimplifying the issue a little, but I certainly believe that the separatist attitudes of many people in the media hierarchy are afraid of your proposed "Experimental Media", because it's not a sure bet and doesn't allow them to maintain their current attitudes towards other forms of media.
Just a thought, and I could always be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;ve been saying pretty much the same thing about local media products for a while now. Why aren&#8217;t we, with our current &#8216;deficiency&#8217;, seeking to encourage more cross-pollination between multiple media platforms? Of course, we often see why (especially in journalism lectures at university, let me tell you); the old biases are still standing up like barbed wire fencing around each alternate media hub. The newspaper &#8216;journos&#8217; still see themselves as better than the TV/radio guys, who like to think of themselves as stars (and, honestly, who in South Africa can convince you that they&#8217;re an honest-to-gosh &#8220;star&#8221;?).<br />
Maybe I&#8217;m oversimplifying the issue a little, but I certainly believe that the separatist attitudes of many people in the media hierarchy are afraid of your proposed &#8220;Experimental Media&#8221;, because it&#8217;s not a sure bet and doesn&#8217;t allow them to maintain their current attitudes towards other forms of media.<br />
Just a thought, and I could always be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
